Washington, D.C. · Est. 2009

Justice.

Vol. XVII · 2026

The verdicts that moved the needle.
The coverage that followed.

Jury Awards $14.2M in Excessive Force Case

The Washington PostNov 2025

Landmark Ruling Expands Qualified Immunity Challenge

ReutersAug 2025

Federal Court Finds Systemic Pattern in Police Chokeholds

The New York TimesMar 2025

$6.8M Settlement Reached in Housing Discrimination Suit

Bloomberg LawJan 2025

Appeals Court Revives First Amendment Retaliation Claims

Law360Oct 2024

City of Baltimore Forced to Overhaul Use-of-Force Policies

The AtlanticJul 2024

Civil Rights Attorneys Secure Consent Decree Against Metro PD

NPRApr 2024

Court Orders Body Camera Footage Release in Misconduct Case

ProPublicaFeb 2024
Washington PostReutersNew York TimesBloomberg LawLaw360The AtlanticNPRProPublicaPoliticoACLU PressWashington PostReutersNew York TimesBloomberg LawLaw360The AtlanticNPRProPublicaPoliticoACLU Press
2024
Attorney Valentina Calderon in formal attire, confident expression, steel-toned office background

Valentina Calderon

Senior Partner

Harrington v. City of Philadelphia

When Marcus Harrington was beaten unconscious during a traffic stop, the department claimed the body camera malfunctioned. Calderon obtained seventeen months of maintenance records showing the department had never serviced a single camera on that unit. She took the case to a Philadelphia federal jury in eleven days.

"The camera did not malfunction. The policy did. And that distinction is the difference between a $200 settlement and a $14.2 million verdict."

— Closing argument, E.D. Pa., October 2024

$14.2M

Verdict

11 Days

Duration

Policy Liability

Precedent

Precedent Set

Established municipal liability for systemic camera maintenance failures under Monell.

2025
Attorney Emeka Okafor in suit, professional setting, focused expression

Emeka Okafor

Partner

Tenant Coalition v. Meridian Properties LLC

Forty-three families in Southeast D.C. received eviction notices within six weeks of a rezoning application. Okafor cross-referenced application timestamps, lease termination dates, and demographic data to demonstrate a coordinated displacement pattern. The discovery deposition of Meridian's property director lasted four hours and produced the document that ended the case.

"You sent the eviction notices before you filed the rezoning application. That sequence is not coincidence. That sequence is a policy."

— Deposition of R. Whitmore, Meridian Properties, March 2025

$6.8M

Settlement

43

Families

Decree

Consent

Precedent Set

Consent decree requires Meridian to provide 18-month right-of-return to displaced tenants.

Complex civil rights cases require counsel who have been there. We have.

Discuss Co-Counsel →
2023
Attorney Layla Ibrahim in professional attire, confident pose, neutral background

Layla Ibrahim

Partner

Reyes v. County of Cook

A Cook County corrections officer filed a grievance about inmate medical neglect. Within thirty days he was reassigned, stripped of overtime, and subjected to three disciplinary investigations — all initiated after the grievance date. Ibrahim filed in the Northern District of Illinois and moved for summary judgment. The county settled before the hearing.

"Every investigation you opened against my client was filed after he spoke. The First Amendment does not have a thirty-day grace period."

— Summary judgment oral argument, N.D. Ill., September 2023

$2.1M

Settlement

Full Rank

Reinstate

Reformed

Policy

Precedent Set

County required to implement independent review process for post-grievance disciplinary actions.

2025
Attorney Daniel Nakamura in formal attire, professional expression, office environment

Daniel Nakamura

Senior Associate

Whitfield v. City of Memphis

Three prior federal courts had dismissed similar claims against the Memphis PD on qualified immunity grounds. Nakamura distinguished each precedent by isolating a 2019 internal training memo that explicitly described the prohibited conduct as permissible. The Sixth Circuit reversed the dismissal, creating the most significant qualified immunity limitation in the circuit in eight years.

"Qualified immunity shields officers who did not know the law. It does not shield a department that taught the violation as procedure."

— Sixth Circuit oral argument, February 2025

6th Cir.

Circuit

Dismissal

Reversed

8-Year High

Impact

Precedent Set

Whitfield v. Memphis, 6th Cir. 2025 — departments cannot claim qualified immunity when internal training documents authorize the conduct at issue.

Outcomes that speak
before the brief does.

Since 2009. Federal courts in twelve circuits. Cases other firms declined to take.

$0M+

Total Recovered

Verdicts & Settlements

0

Federal Verdicts

District & Circuit Courts

0

Consent Decrees

Municipal Reform Orders

0

Published Opinions

Circuit-Level Precedents

Harrington v. City of PhiladelphiaExcessive Force2024$14.2M Verdict
Tenant Coalition v. Meridian PropertiesHousing Discrimination2025$6.8M Settlement
Reyes v. County of CookFirst Amendment2023$2.1M Settlement
Whitfield v. City of MemphisQualified Immunity20256th Cir. Reversal
Dominguez v. NYPDExcessive Force2022$8.5M Settlement
Freeman v. Chicago Housing AuthorityHousing Discrimination2023Consent Decree

Narrow focus.
Maximum exposure for the other side.

01Active

Police Misconduct

Excessive Force · Wrongful Arrest · Unlawful Search

Section 1983 claims against officers and municipalities where policy, custom, or deliberate indifference caused constitutional injury. We pursue Monell liability when individual officer immunity shields the institution.

42 U.S.C. § 19834th AmendmentMonell DoctrineBivens Actions

Key Victory

Harrington v. Philadelphia — $14.2M, policy liability established

02Active

Housing Discrimination

Displacement · Redlining · Disparate Impact

Fair Housing Act litigation against developers, municipalities, and housing authorities. We use data-driven discovery to convert statistical patterns into cognizable legal claims and consent decrees that mandate structural reform.

Fair Housing Act42 U.S.C. § 3604Title VIADA § 504

Key Victory

Tenant Coalition v. Meridian — $6.8M + right-of-return consent decree

03Active

First Amendment Retaliation

Public Employee Speech · Protest Rights · Press Access

Constitutional challenges where government actors punish protected speech, association, or petition. We represent whistleblowers, journalists, and protest organizers whose exercise of First Amendment rights triggered official retaliation.

1st Amendment42 U.S.C. § 1983Pickering-ConnickRFRA

Key Victory

Reyes v. Cook County — $2.1M + independent disciplinary review

04Active

Qualified Immunity Challenges

Municipal Liability · Pattern & Practice · Systemic Reform

Strategic litigation targeting the qualified immunity doctrine where internal training materials, department policies, or established circuit precedent clearly prohibit the conduct at issue. We build records designed for appellate reversal.

Harlow v. FitzgeraldPearson v. Callahan14th AmendmentDOJ Pattern & Practice

Key Victory

Whitfield v. Memphis — 6th Circuit reversal, 8-year precedent shift

Your client deserves counsel
who has been in this courtroom.

We accept co-counsel engagements on a selective basis. All inquiries are reviewed by a named partner within one business day.

All inquiries are confidential. We do not share referral information.

Not ready to call?

Download our case results — 47 verdicts,
organized by practice area.